Media Bury Illegal Alien's Alleged Attempt To Run Over ICE Agent 81%

By Brianna Lyman87%

7/10/2026, 11:33:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 852 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,038 of 20,540 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the article peer group.

Image Credit KCENNews / Youtube 
The allegation that Araujo used his car as a deadly weapon prior to being fatally shot is central to the entire story  yet the propaganda press obfuscated it. 
Visit on Twitter @briannalyman2 
An illegal alien from Mexico was fatally shot Tuesday after he allegedly tried to run over an ICE agent with his vehicle during an enforcement operation, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 
But you wouldn’t necessarily glean that if you read some of the headlines from members of the propaganda press. 
The incident unfolded Tuesday morning when ICE agents “attempted to conduct a vehicle stop as part of a targeted enforcement operation to arrest an illegal alien. 
The driver of the vehicle, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo  an illegal alien from Mexico  attempted to evade arrest,” according to DHS . 
DHS said it received information that Araujo “rammed an ICE law enforcement vehicle, refused to follow multiple verbal commands, and weaponized his vehicle in an attempt to run over an ICE law enforcement officer resulting in our officer firing his weapon in self-defense.” 
If that account is accurate, then the shooting occurred only after Araujo’ allegedly attempted ‘s alleged attempt to use his vehicle to kill or seriously injure a federal officer. 
CNN ’s Dalia Faheid and Chris Boyette nevertheless headlined their piece: “For 35 years, a Mexican father built homes in Houston. 
Then a morning drive ended in tragedy.” 
Instead of leading with the details DHS says led to the shooting, Faheid and Boyette begin their story emphasizing Araujo’s family and profession. 
The third paragraph then states: “An Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in an unmarked car fatally shot the Mexican man inside his van, Salgado Araujo’s oldest son recounted Wednesday.” 
Notably, the son was not present during the incident, making his account secondhand. 
CNN did not tell readers that Araujo allegedly tried to run the officer over, instead simply saying that Araujo “attempted to evade arrest as agents tried to conduct a traffic stop as part of a ‘targeted operation.’ 
He rammed into a law enforcement vehicle and refused to follow several verbal commands before an ICE agent fired his weapon in self-defense, the agency told CNN in a statement Tuesday.” 
CNN later updated the article and changed the headline. 
ABC News posted an article written by Armando Garcia on X : “Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers shot and killed a Mexican national during an incident in Houston on Tuesday, the agency said.” 
The article itself is even more skewed than the post on X, however, as its headline begins with a quote from Araujo’s son that “he did not deserve to die.” 
Garcia avoided the central allegation that precipitated the shooting  that is, Araujo allegedly trying to run the officer over  in the article’s opening paragraphs. 
By the third paragraph readers are only told that “Araujo is allegedly undocumented and didn’t follow verbal commands, according to ICE. 
This is the second ICE-involved shooting in less than a week.” 
Only in the fifth paragraph does ABC News inform readers that DHS says Araujo allegedly attempted to run over an ICE officer with his vehicle. 
But a reader who never made it that far could easily conclude that the fatal shooting stemmed from an illegal alien simply ignoring “verbal commands.” 
Houston Public Media’s Kyle McClenagan and Bianca Seward chose a headline that was similarly misleading: “ICE agent fatally shoots man in Houston during ‘targeted enforcement operation.’” 
Click2Houston ‘s “award-winning” journalist Brittany Taylor omitted the allegation almost entirely. 
In a story headlined “‘A hardworking Mexican man’: Son of man killed by ICE in Houston demands investigation,” Taylor fails to include any of DHS’s allegations about what led to the fatal shooting. 
The New York Times’ Edgar Sandoval similarly misled readers in his headline: “ICE Officer Kills a Mexican Man in Houston.” 
He noted in his subhead that Araujo allegedly tried to run over the officer, but indicated there is no evidence to support such a claim. 
The allegation that Araujo used his car as a deadly weapon prior to being fatally shot is central to the entire story  yet the propaganda press sidestepped or obfuscated it. 
This article has been updated since publication. 
Brianna Lyman is an elections correspondent at The Federalist. 
Brianna graduated from Fordham University with a degree in International Political Economy. 
Her work has been featured on Newsmax, Fox News, Fox Business and RealClearPolitics. 
Follow Brianna on X: @briannalyman2 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
FCC Chair Vows To Crack Down On Anti-Conservative Media’s ‘Free Monopoly’ 
Axios Says The Problem With Democrats’ Embrace Of Communism Is Republicans Noticing 
Propaganda Media Gear Up To Whitewash New York’s Socialist Takeover 
WaPo Downplays Attempted Assassination By Antifa As ‘ICE Protest’ 
Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 5 
MIA Mitch McConnell Must Explain His Absence Or Retire 
Increasing Number Of Ivy League Students Can’t Even Read, So Let’s Stop Calling Them ‘Elite’ 
5 Top Reasons The Smithsonian American History Museum Is A National Disgrace 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.9%Brianna Lyman: 12.5%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias26.9%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Brianna Lyman: 5.7%The Federalist: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.6%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.8%Brianna Lyman: 1.1%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.6%The Federalist: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.2%Brianna Lyman: 17.5%The Federalist: 10.2%Framing Effect23.2%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.9%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Brianna Lyman: 1.8%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 28.5%Brianna Lyman: 14.3%The Federalist: 12.2%Negativity Bias28.5%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.8%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Brianna Lyman: 1.6%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 3.4%The Federalist: 4.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 2.8%The Federalist: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Brianna Lyman: 0.7%The Federalist: 2.3%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Brianna Lyman: 2.9%The Federalist: 1.2%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 12.0%Brianna Lyman: 1.3%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect12.0%This article: 2.2%Brianna Lyman: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias2.2%This article: 9.5%Brianna Lyman: 4.2%The Federalist: 5.2%Ad Hominem9.5%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 2.9%The Federalist: 2.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.0%Brianna Lyman: 6.9%The Federalist: 5.2%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 6.9%Brianna Lyman: 2.9%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma6.9%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.7%Brianna Lyman: 13.9%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization10.7%This article: 3.5%Brianna Lyman: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.4%Red Herring3.5%This article: 5.4%Brianna Lyman: 0.9%The Federalist: 0.6%Bandwagon5.4%This article: 7.2%Brianna Lyman: 8.4%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 4.5%The Federalist: 3.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Brianna Lyman: 2.4%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 16.1%Brianna Lyman: 3.5%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof16.1%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.4%Brianna Lyman: 6.0%The Federalist: 2.7%Anecdotal3.4%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.3%Brianna Lyman: 3.9%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.3%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 8.2%Brianna Lyman: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy8.2%This article: 23.0%Brianna Lyman: 5.8%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote23.0%This article: 16.8%Brianna Lyman: 4.1%The Federalist: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection16.8%This article: 43.5%Brianna Lyman: 23.4%The Federalist: 19.9%Biased Writer Voice43.5%This article: 4.7%Brianna Lyman: 3.6%The Federalist: 5.4%Indoctrination4.7%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brianna Lyman: 18.5%The Federalist: 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Brianna Lyman: 0.4%The Federalist: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

852 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers22%attributed speech662writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageCNN • 21 words • 100.0% coverageCNN • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageArmando Garcia • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageEdgar Sandoval • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageImmigration and Customs Enforcement • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Armando Garcia

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words17% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+87.0 ptsWriter: 13.0%Armando Garcia: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+86.6 ptsWriter: 13.4%Armando Garcia: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-56.0 ptsWriter: 56.0%Armando Garcia: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Armando Garcia: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%Armando Garcia: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.