Keyword summary
47% 36 analyzed articles/videos 25,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Times results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 12,785 hits . Analysis detected 116,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 120,845 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (29,261 of 35,856 keywords). This New York Times is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. New York Times
Keyword details
Total words: 120,845
Article count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score36 analyzed articles120.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst