Author summary
20%4 analyzed articles/videos814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Dominguez results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 3,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,084 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,943 of 6,192 authors). This Catherine Dominguez is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Catherine Dominguez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
37%Catherine Dominguez (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,084
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate