Fox News88%

Trump DOJ withdraws subpoenas targeting New York Times journalists amid leak probe 17%

7/24/2026, 1:01:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Biased Writer Voice, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 461 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (17,714 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the article peer group.

The Justice Department withdrew subpoenas Thursday it had previously filed against three New York Times journalists as part of a leak probe. 
The DOJ sought the grand jury testimony and phone records of Times journalists Tyler Pager, Julian Barnes, Eric Schmitt and Eric Lipton, all of whom had a byline on a report published earlier this month revealing President Donald Trump flew home from Turkey on his old Air Force One instead of the new Qatar-donated Boeing 747-8 he flew into the NATO summit amid security concerns, something Trump denied. 
The Times report , citing anonymous sources, prompted a leak probe by the DOJ, hoping to target those who gave the Times journalists the sensitive information. 
"Today’s proceeding was an important affirmation of our country’s commitment to a free press," New York Times Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel David McCraw said in a statement to Fox News Digital. 
"We are pleased that the government finally conceded that the subpoenas violated the law, but they should never have been issued in the first place. 
The Times and our journalists will continue to report and seek the truth without fear or favor. 
We will not be deterred in the face of tactics like these." 
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. 
Upon his departure from the NATO summit in Turkey, Trump flew out on his old Air Force One instead of the new one gifted to the administration by Qatar that he had previously used. 
However, the Times alleged the change was made due to the escalated military tensions between the U.S. and Iran. 
Trump dismissed any security concerns with the jet, instead posting on Truth Social that the Mildenhall stop was conducted so service members stationed on the base could view the new aircraft. 
The subpoenas targeting the Times journalists sparked an outcry among critics, accusing the Trump administration of violating First Amendment rights. 
The DOJ previously defended the subpoenas, highlighting the crime of leaking national security information while stressing that the Times journalists weren't the target of the probe. 
"We value and appreciate the important role that the press plays in this country, but DOJ also plays an important role to make sure that the people entrusted with our nation's secrets do what they're supposed to do with that information, which means not sharing classified information," a DOJ spokesperson said at the time. 
"We recognize there may always be natural tension there, but we are not going to ignore the law and stop investigating the people who work in the administration and think it's okay to leak classified information impacting national security." 
Fox News' Julia Bonavita contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 9.8%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma8.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 5.4%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 25.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote25.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.4%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice7.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

461 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech373writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 68 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 34 words • 100.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 25 words • 100.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

David McCraw

100%flagged-word coverage
88 attributed words100% of attributed speech44% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+38.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%David McCraw: 38.6%38.6%Unattributed Quote+3.5 ptsWriter: 24.9%David McCraw: 28.4%28.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.