Author summary
86% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Boggioni results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 2,753 hits . Analysis detected 15,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,771 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,810 of 6,628 authors). This Tom Boggioni is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Tom Boggioni
Author details
Total words: 9,771
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.7% 19.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.2% 28.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.9% 20.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 28.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst