Raw Story⁠93%

Ex-Trump adviser pleads guilty to national security violation ⁠11%

By Tom Boggioni⁠86%

6/26/2026, 2:45:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 266 faulty-reasoning hits from 204 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (19,521 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the article peer group.

John Bolton, who served as President Donald Trump's national security adviser during his first term before becoming one of his harshest critics, entered a guilty plea Friday to one federal charge of illegally retaining classified national defense information. 
According to NBC News, Bolton appeared before Judge Theodore D. 
Chuang in Greenbelt, Maryland, for a re-arraignment hearing, where he admitted to the retention charge involving sensitive materials from his White House tenure. 
The classified materials at issue included personal diary entries containing information classified at the top-secret level. 
Bolton acknowledged sharing these sensitive documents with two family members, according to court documents. 
The guilty plea carries significant consequences. 
Bolton faces up to five years in federal prison and has agreed to pay $2.25 million in penalties. 
His sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 
28. 
Originally indicted in October 2025, prosecutors brought eight counts of transmitting national defense information and 10 counts of illegal retention — charges that could have resulted in a decade behind bars and substantial fines. 
Bolton's plea agreement appears to represent a negotiated resolution with prosecutors, allowing him to resolve the most serious allegations while maintaining his cooperation with the government, NBC News is reporting. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.7%Tom Boggioni: 4.8%Rawstory: 8.4%Confirmation Bias14.7%This article: 16.7%Tom Boggioni: 1.4%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias16.7%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 6.8%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.3%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.7%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Tom Boggioni: 20.8%Rawstory: 13.4%Framing Effect17.6%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.0%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 18.6%Tom Boggioni: 1.1%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.7%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 5.4%Rawstory: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Tom Boggioni: 28.2%Rawstory: 21.6%Negativity Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.4%Rawstory: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 3.9%Rawstory: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.2%Rawstory: 2.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.2%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.7%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.2%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.9%Rawstory: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 2.3%Rawstory: 6.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.7%Tom Boggioni: 4.8%Rawstory: 4.1%Appeal to Authority14.7%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.8%Rawstory: 3.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.7%Rawstory: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 10.5%Rawstory: 12.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.1%Rawstory: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 8.5%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.2%Rawstory: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 2.4%Rawstory: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 1.0%Rawstory: 1.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 4.8%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 3.9%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.8%Tom Boggioni: 5.4%Rawstory: 5.3%Unattributed Quote11.8%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 4.1%Rawstory: 4.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 33.3%Tom Boggioni: 19.7%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice33.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.7%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 4.1%Rawstory: 8.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.9%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Boggioni: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

204 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech164writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageNBC News • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageNBC News • 30 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

NBC News

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words100% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Biased Writer Voice+51.8 ptsWriter: 23.2%NBC News: 75.0%75.0%Unattributed Quote+16.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%NBC News: 25.0%25.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.