Topic summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Classified Information results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 3,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,385 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,076 of 16,562 topics). This Classified Information is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Classified Information

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate