Author summary
30% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaelan Deese results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 1,128 hits . Analysis detected 12,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,222 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,564 of 6,359 authors). This Kaelan Deese is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Kaelan Deese
Author details
Total words: 19,222
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst