Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Defense Information results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 362 faulty-reasoning hits from 816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,085 of 16,562 topics). This National Defense Information is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
National Defense Information
Topic details
Total words: 816
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles816 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos