Topic summary
43% 8 analyzed articles/videos 13,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donald Trump Administration results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 4,158 hits . Analysis detected 41,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,034 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,897 of 16,562 topics). This Donald Trump Administration is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Donald Trump Administration
Topic details
Total words: 49,034
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles49K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst