Author summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These M. Javad Zarif results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,660 hits . Analysis detected 16,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,412 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,399 of 6,215 authors). This M. Javad Zarif is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. M. Javad Zarif
Author details
Total words: 14,412
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst