Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 10,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Nieto results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 7,050 hits . Analysis detected 52,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,516 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,602 of 6,323 authors). This Phillip Nieto is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Phillip Nieto
Author details
Total words: 34,516
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score15 analyzed articles34.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.3% 9.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst