Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Hachigian results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,060 hits . Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,781 of 6,316 authors). This Nina Hachigian is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Nina Hachigian
Author details
Total words: 7,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst