Keyword summary
75% 28 analyzed articles/videos 27,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ice) results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 14,964 hits . Analysis detected 121,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 118,547 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,148 of 34,692 keywords). This Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ice) is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ice)
Keyword details
Total words: 118,547
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score28 analyzed articles118.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst