Author summary
68% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,697 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmyn Jordan results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,397 hits . Analysis detected 12,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,645 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,954 of 6,215 authors). This Jasmyn Jordan is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Jasmyn Jordan
Author details
Total words: 12,645
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst