Breitbart81%

Two Texas Polls Show Paxton Leading Talarico in Senate Race 57%

By Jasmyn Jordan69%

6/23/2026, 10:10:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 584 faulty-reasoning hits from 292 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,490 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the article peer group.

Two Texas Senate polls put Republican Ken Paxton ahead of Democrat James Talarico: one has Paxton up by two points, while another finds the race moving from a previous Talarico lead to a narrow Paxton edge. 
A new YouGov poll of registered voters dated June 12 showed Paxton leading Talarico, 49 percent to 47 percent, in the Texas U.S. 
Senate race. 
The same YouGov poll showed Republican Gov. 
Greg Abbott leading Democrat Hinojosa, 47 percent to 40 percent, in a Texas governor matchup. 
A separate University of Texas/Texas Politics Project poll showed Talarico moving from an eight-point lead over Sen. 
John Cornyn in April, 42 percent to 34 percent, to a one-point deficit against Paxton in June, 42 percent to 43 percent. 
CNN Senior Political Reporter Aaron Blake wrote, “Big shift in Texas… Why? 
Paxton consolidated the GOP. 
In April, Paxton got 63% of GOP voters, with 10% going to Talarico. 
Now, Paxton gets 84%, with 5% for Talarico. 
Talarico still leads big w/ indies.” 
The polling follows Paxton’s Republican Senate primary runoff victory over Cornyn, after which Talarico appealed to Cornyn supporters by saying they had “a place in our campaign,” while Paxton thanked Texas and said Republicans “must unite to defeat the most well-funded, radical Democrat in America.” 
Trump, who endorsed Paxton in the runoff, congratulated Paxton on a “tremendous win,” said he and Cornyn would watch Paxton become a “fantastic, common sense Senator,” and criticized Talarico as “the worst TEXAS candidate I have ever seen.” 
Talarico has also claimed Paxton has a criminal record, though a Breitbart News fact check rated the claim false, noting that Paxton has no formal criminal record and that charges against him were dropped. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.4%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias14.4%This article: 5.8%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.8%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.4%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.2%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.1%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 31.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 11.0%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect31.2%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 5.0%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 31.5%Jasmyn Jordan: 6.3%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias31.5%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.4%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.6%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.4%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.7%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.8%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect13.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 26.7%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias26.7%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.5%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.6%Jasmyn Jordan: 4.5%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority11.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.3%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 9.0%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 7.5%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion13.0%This article: 4.1%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 16.8%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.3%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.8%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.0%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.6%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.1%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.7%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote4.1%This article: 4.1%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.1%This article: 19.9%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.2%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice19.9%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 4.9%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

292 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers18%attributed speech238writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Blake • 12 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Blake • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words70% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+93.3 ptsWriter: 6.7%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.