Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken-Paxton results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 588 hits . Analysis detected 3,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,705 of 36,446 keywords). This Ken-Paxton is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Ken-Paxton
Keyword details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst