Author summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarrod Wardwell results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , False Dilemma , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 139 hits . Analysis detected 1,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,238 of 6,495 authors). This Jarrod Wardwell is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Jarrod Wardwell
Author details
Total words: 2,838
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst