Keyword summary
81% 20 analyzed articles/videos 12,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Talarico results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 8,608 hits . Analysis detected 76,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,473 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (21,626 of 35,646 keywords). This James Talarico is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. James Talarico
Keyword details
Total words: 58,473
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score20 analyzed articles58.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst