Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Taylor Goldenstein results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 2,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Taylor Goldenstein is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Taylor Goldenstein
Author details
Total words: 2,157
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 14.4% 14.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst