Keyword summary
64% 19 analyzed articles/videos 17,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s. Senate results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 6,877 hits . Analysis detected 56,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,817 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,944 of 35,444 keywords). This U.s. Senate is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. U.s. Senate
Keyword details
Total words: 63,817
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score19 analyzed articles63.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst