Author summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 3,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Klibanoff results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,819 hits . Analysis detected 8,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,765 of 6,171 authors). This Eleanor Klibanoff is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Eleanor Klibanoff
Author details
Total words: 12,072
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.1% 15.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst