Author summary
67%9 analyzed articles/videos3,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Weibel results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,656 hits. Analysis detected 16,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,388 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,744 of 6,170 authors). This Elizabeth Weibel is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Weibel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
56%Elizabeth Weibel (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,388
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate