Breitbart83%

Vance Remembers Lindsey Graham: 'One Of A Kind Figure in Our Politics' 56%

By Elizabeth Weibel68% #author71%

7/12/2026, 3:31:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 625 faulty-reasoning hits from 410 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,075 of 20,496 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the article peer group.

Vice President JD Vance remembered Sen. 
Lindsey Graham (R-SC) after his office announced he died at the age of 71 “from a brief and sudden illness,” describing Graham as a “one of a kind figure in our politics.” 
In a post on X, Vance shared his experiences with Graham, such as how he had gotten into a “shouting match” with him regarding a Ukraine funding bill” and how the next day he found out Graham was supporting legislation Vance “really cared about.” 
Vance also shared that Graham “had the best sense of humor in the Senate.” 
“Lindsey Graham came from humble beginnings and became one of the most powerful lawmakers in the most powerful nation on Earth,” Vance wrote. 
“His story was a fundamentally American one.” 
Vance’s post continued: “Early in my Senate tenure, I remember getting into a shouting match with Lindsey about a Ukraine funding bill at lunch and then learning the very next day that he was pushing rail legislation I really cared about behind the scenes. 
That was Lindsey Graham. 
He fought like hell for the things he believed in, and he was just as willing to go to bat for you when it counted.” 
The post from Vance continued in part: 
Lindsey had the best sense of humor in the Senate. 
He loved the game of politics. 
He was constantly asking which races were up and down, and how he could help. 
As he liked to say, “I don’t care if you’re an isolationist or a religious fanatic, so long as you have an R next to your name, I want you to win.” 
Vance’s post comes after Graham’s office posted a statement to X sharing that the South Carolina senator passed away on July 11. 
“On the evening on Saturday, July 11, U.S. 
Senator Lindsey Graham passed away from a brief and sudden illness,” the statement from Graham’s office said. 
“Senator Graham’s family appreciates prayers at this time and asks for privacy during this incredibly difficult period.” 
Breitbart News’s Olivia Rondeau reported that Graham who never got married or had any children, “served in the U.S. 
Senate for over two decades.” 
In a post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump described Graham as being “one of the greatest people and Senators” he had ever known. 
“He was always working, and was a true American Patriot,” Trump continued. 
“Lindsey will be greatly missed!!!” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.9%Breitbart: 4.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.8%Breitbart: 4.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.2%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Elizabeth Weibel: 12.4%Breitbart: 11.6%Framing Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.7%Elizabeth Weibel: 3.1%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Elizabeth Weibel: 9.1%Breitbart: 9.6%Negativity Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 4.5%Breitbart: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Elizabeth Weibel: 3.7%Breitbart: 4.9%In-Group Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 28.5%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.3%Breitbart: 3.2%Halo Effect28.5%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.1%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 3.9%Breitbart: 3.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.4%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.8%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.2%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma7.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.7%Breitbart: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.5%Breitbart: 8.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.6%Breitbart: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.4%Elizabeth Weibel: 9.9%Breitbart: 9.0%Appeal to Emotion5.4%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.5%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.7%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.9%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 31.2%Elizabeth Weibel: 4.4%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal31.2%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.8%Breitbart: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.4%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 7.8%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection7.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.6%Breitbart: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.5%Breitbart: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.9%Breitbart: 7.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

410 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers81%attributed speech79writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageJD Vance • 44 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJD Vance • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 44 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGraham’s office • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGraham’s office • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGraham’s office • 17 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Rondeau • 19 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Rondeau • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

JD Vance

100%flagged-word coverage
224 attributed words68% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Quote-first Misdirection-40.5 ptsWriter: 40.5%JD Vance: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+10.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%JD Vance: 10.3%10.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.