Speaker summary
59% 180 analyzed articles/videos 16,179.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JD Vance results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 1,227.202 hits . Analysis detected 21,509.446 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,179.667 analyzed words across 180 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,284 of 28,364 speakers). This JD Vance is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. JD Vance
Speaker details
Total words: 16,179.667
Article count: 180
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score180 analyzed videos16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst