Author summary
94% 15 analyzed articles/videos 5,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Arama results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 9,810 hits . Analysis detected 59,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,548 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,700 of 6,277 authors). This Nick Arama is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Nick Arama
Author details
Total words: 28,548
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.9% percentile 3.8% BS Score15 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.4% 34.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 24.4% 24.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 24.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 21.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst