RedState⁠91%

Priceless: Gavin Newsom Throws a Tantrum at Joe Rogan Over JD Vance Interview ⁠86%

By Nick Arama⁠94%

7/22/2026, 8:37:47 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 1,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 667 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 77.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (3,093 of 21,181 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the article peer group.

It seems California Gov. 
Gavin Newsom has been running for president in 2028 forever now, and it's still two years away. 
We're not even close to it yet, and it's not going well for him. 
People are already tired of him. 
Newsom is already throwing tantrums on X about another likely 2028 candidate, Vice President JD Vance, and Vance's appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast. 
Rogan and Vance spoke about how they both loved California, having lived there, but how it's gone to pot. 
Joe Rogan and Vice President JD Vance spent nearly 20 minutes talking about California in a recent podcast episode, oscillating between how much they love the state and how much it’s “going further and further down the toilet.” 
[....] 
The duo spent almost three hours in a wide-ranging conversation largely centered on politics, circling back to California several times, a state where they’ve both lived. 
Rogan and Vance each talked about how much they admired the state but how it’s been ruined by politics, homelessness, taxes, corruption and a high cost of living. 
Rogan went on about how people were moving out, and Newsom was gaslighting people. 
VICE PRESIDENT JD VANCE & JOE ROGAN DISCUSS HOW PEOPLE ARE LEAVING LA, SAN FRANCISCO, & CALIFORNIA 
JOE ROGAN: “Places like New York and really California, like especially Los Angeles and San Francisco, they’re falling apart. 
And I have a bunch of friends that are stuck there… https://t.co/M11BpszFAg pic.twitter.com/t7Ng0ZekdH 
— Zach Jones - Secretary of Psyops (@ZachJones1994) July 20, 2026 
"Politics ruined it," Rogan said. 
Vance said we shouldn't let it go, “If you just abandon California, you’ve, like, lost something very core to American culture." 
Now, Newsom's response to Rogan should have been, "Hey, Joe, have me on to talk about how I'm working to fix things." 
Of course, he can't really say that because he isn't. 
Plus, Rogan already has his number, previously calling Newsom a "conman" and a "cardboard cutout of a person." 
But Newsom really went over the slide, instead, with an unhinged post. 
Joe Rogan is too chicken to have me on — so he and JD Vance spent three hours in their California Derangement Syndrome safe space. 
How cute! 
https://t.co/HUyWPj6mBa 
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) July 22, 2026 
"Joe Rogan is too chicken to have me on," he ranted. 
"So he and JD Vance spent three hours in their California Derangement Syndrome safe space. 
How cute!" 
How childish and jealous. 
Does anyone really think Joe Rogan is afraid of Gov. 
Hair Gel? 
Does Newsom expect people to buy that? 
Of course, the bigger problem is that Newsom terms the disturbing reality about the problems of California that they laid out as "California Derangement Syndrome." 
It's no surprise the problems aren't adequately addressed when leadership refuses to acknowledge the problems are real or how their Democratic policies may have contributed to the issues. 
Plus, given what we've seen of Newsom, Rogan's format of such a long interview would expose all Newsom's flaws, and Rogan would rightly grill Newsom over his failures. 
READ MORE: Putting the 'Progress' in Progressivism — 13M Pounds of Revolting Waste Removed From Dystopian LA Park 
Newsom Lawyers Up As Missing Tax Returns Fuel More Questions About Federal Probe 
Newsom's juvenile post understandably earned a lot of reaction. 
He’s busy calling Joe Rogan a chicken right now. 
He doesn’t have time for fires https://t.co/iYdKp6Dhae 
— GraceUnderPressure (@ExitStageRite) July 22, 2026 
Insulting Joe Rogan is probably the dumbest possible thing someone who wants to be President could do... https://t.co/LN6VA3RcJc 
— Andrew Follett (@AndrewCFollett) July 22, 2026 
Almost a year ago you said you were “moving on” 😂 pic.twitter.com/VexLNrDAXN 
— Gina Milan (@ginamilan_) July 22, 2026 
Editor's Note: The Democrat Party has never been less popular as voters reject its globalist agenda. 
Help us continue exposing Democrats' plans to lead America down a dangerous path. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.3%Nick Arama: 10.0%RedState: 7.1%Confirmation Bias22.3%This article: 3.9%Nick Arama: 0.3%RedState: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 3.7%Nick Arama: 2.1%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 1.6%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 1.9%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Nick Arama: 1.5%RedState: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias4.2%This article: 13.6%Nick Arama: 7.3%RedState: 9.3%Framing Effect13.6%This article: 5.2%Nick Arama: 0.2%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion5.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 1.1%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Nick Arama: 2.6%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias18.6%This article: 43.9%Nick Arama: 21.4%RedState: 14.1%Negativity Bias43.9%This article: 3.3%Nick Arama: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.3%This article: 1.3%Nick Arama: 3.2%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.5%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 6.1%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 5.5%RedState: 3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 1.6%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 1.5%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Nick Arama: 1.7%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 1.5%Nick Arama: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 1.0%Nick Arama: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.0%This article: 20.5%Nick Arama: 11.9%RedState: 7.0%Ad Hominem20.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 3.1%RedState: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 3.6%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 2.3%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.7%Nick Arama: 1.2%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 4.2%Nick Arama: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning4.2%This article: 13.0%Nick Arama: 13.6%RedState: 10.2%Hasty Generalization13.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.9%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 1.1%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.0%Nick Arama: 7.6%RedState: 8.7%Appeal to Emotion10.0%This article: 0.7%Nick Arama: 2.7%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 2.1%Nick Arama: 1.6%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.1%This article: 1.8%Nick Arama: 1.8%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque1.8%This article: 7.5%Nick Arama: 0.7%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof7.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.3%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.2%Nick Arama: 0.5%RedState: 0.4%Composition/Division4.2%This article: 7.6%Nick Arama: 1.9%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal7.6%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.5%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.7%Nick Arama: 1.4%RedState: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.0%Nick Arama: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity1.0%This article: 5.7%Nick Arama: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading5.7%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.7%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.5%Nick Arama: 2.8%RedState: 2.5%Unattributed Quote8.5%This article: 2.8%Nick Arama: 2.1%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 31.9%Nick Arama: 34.4%RedState: 22.0%Biased Writer Voice31.9%This article: 1.9%Nick Arama: 7.1%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination1.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Arama: 0.3%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Nick Arama: 24.4%RedState: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.5%This article: 4.0%Nick Arama: 5.2%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.0%

667 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers9.9%attributed speech601writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageZach Jones - Secretary of Psyops • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGraceUnderPressure (@ExitStageRite) • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Follett (@AndrewCFollett) • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGina Milan (@ginamilan_) • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gavin Newsom

80%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words53% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-35.4 ptsWriter: 35.4%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.