Keyword summary
96%1 analyzed article/video667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Podcast Controversy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 3,913 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 82% (7,066 of 37,536 keywords). This Podcast Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Podcast Controversy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Podcast Controversy (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,001
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 29.0%29.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos