Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California-Politics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,811 hits . Analysis detected 12,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,022 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,443 of 15,435 topics). This California-Politics is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. California-Politics
Topic details
Total words: 13,022
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst