Author summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J. Garvin Walsh results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 541 hits . Analysis detected 4,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,475 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,070 of 6,628 authors). This J. Garvin Walsh is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. J. Garvin Walsh
Author details
Total words: 4,475
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst