Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Koehn results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 8,363 hits . Analysis detected 46,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,316 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,930 of 6,138 authors). This Josh Koehn is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Josh Koehn
Author details
Total words: 32,316
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles32.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.9% 25.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst