California Almost Completely Ignores Recent SCOTUS 2A Ruling While Defending Glock Ban From DOJ Suit 77%

By Harold Hutchison0%

7/6/2026, 7:43:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 632 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,118 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the article peer group.

Democratic California Attorney General Rob Bonta appeared to brush off the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wolford v. 
Lopez while defending the state’s ban on Glock pistols. 
After Bonta refused to discuss a possible settlement with Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed suit in federal court to invalidate the measure and California’s “Unsafe Handgun Act,” seeking a temporary restraining order against the Glock ban, which Bonta opposed in a July 2 court filing. 
In that filing, Bonta mentioned the high court’s June 25 ruling only once in passing, while not addressing the major points of the opinion written by Associate Justice Samuel Alito. 
(RELATED: Biden Justice Really Worried Judges Might Actually Apply Second Amendment In Gun Cases) 
“AB 1127 was a reasonable legislative response to the growing spread of, and increasing accessibility to, what California law calls a ‘pistol converter,’ and what the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (U.S. 
ATF) calls ‘machinegun conversion devices’ or ‘MCDs,’” Bonta’s office argued before United States District Judge Anne Hwang of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, a Biden appointee. 
“A semiautomatic pistol that can be readily converted into a machinegun with a 3-D printed pistol converter is thus a ‘distinctively modern’ problem,” Bonta’s office argued near the end of their filing, citing the Wolford decision and quoting its discussion of a previous Second Amendment case heard by the Supreme Court. 
California was the first state to enact a ban on the popular semi-automatic pistols when Democratic California Gov. 
Gavin Newsom signed AB1127 into law in October 2025. 
“Bonta’s opposition papers prove one thing: the various hardware bans of California and the other handful of antigun states are on borrowed time. 
The brief bends over backwards to not cite the Supreme Court’s new Wolford ruling on the question of what an ‘arm’ is, because it makes clear that its arguments are untenable,” Second Amendment Foundation Director of Legal Research and Education Konstadinos Moros told the Daily Caller News Foundation. 
“While Bonta argues a Glock is not even an arm, the Supreme Court just explained that an arm is ‘any weapon customarily used for offensive or defensive purposes.’ 
 
“We hope the court will rule accordingly, and issue the requested temporary restraining order against the Glock sales ban,” Moros continued. 
More than 23 million Glock pistols have been sold worldwide and it has been a popular selection among both civilian and law enforcement users in the United States, according to Handguns magazine. 
(RELATED: Lawyer Hemani: SCOTUS Ruling 2A Ruling Breathed ‘New Life’ Into Landmark 2A Ruling) 
“California politicians will stop at nothing to make it as difficult and expensive as possible to restrict the right to access popular modern firearms like the Glock, which even Kamala Harris claims she chose for her home defense firearm,” California Rifle and Pistol Association President C.D. 
Michel told the DCNF. 
“Converting any firearm into a fully automatic firearm is already illegal, and so is possession of parts that can be used for that purpose,” Michel continued. 
“California law already prohibits access to the latest and safest firearm designs, depriving citizens of the ability to choose a handgun that is best suited for their individual circumstances. 
CRPA applauds the federal government’s efforts.” 
Bonta did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the DCNF. 
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. 
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. 
For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.8%Harold Hutchison: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Harold Hutchison: 3.1%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 5.1%Harold Hutchison: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 3.5%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Harold Hutchison: 11.2%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 1.3%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 1.6%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Harold Hutchison: 3.8%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias7.9%This article: 3.6%Harold Hutchison: 3.7%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 24.7%Harold Hutchison: 7.3%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias24.7%This article: 9.3%Harold Hutchison: 3.7%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias9.3%This article: 2.7%Harold Hutchison: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 2.1%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 1.9%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Harold Hutchison: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 4.7%Harold Hutchison: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 2.9%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 7.3%Harold Hutchison: 1.9%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man7.3%This article: 22.3%Harold Hutchison: 3.8%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority22.3%This article: 4.1%Harold Hutchison: 1.9%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 2.8%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.4%Harold Hutchison: 6.0%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization8.4%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.7%Harold Hutchison: 9.5%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion17.7%This article: 7.6%Harold Hutchison: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question7.6%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 1.7%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.6%Harold Hutchison: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.6%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 2.5%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.8%Harold Hutchison: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.8%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.6%Harold Hutchison: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading7.6%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.2%Harold Hutchison: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 17.4%Harold Hutchison: 4.4%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice17.4%This article: 5.5%Harold Hutchison: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination5.5%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harold Hutchison: 12.0%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Harold Hutchison: 4.7%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.0%

632 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers55%attributed speech282writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageRob Bonta • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRob Bonta • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRob Bonta • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKonstadinos Moros • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKonstadinos Moros • 48 words • 100.0% coverageKonstadinos Moros • 28 words • 0.0% coverageKonstadinos Moros • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKonstadinos Moros • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageC.D. Michel • 46 words • 0.0% coverageC.D. Michel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageC.D. Michel • 26 words • 0.0% coverageC.D. Michel • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Rifle and Pistol Association • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Konstadinos Moros

99%flagged-word coverage
121 attributed words35% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+17.7 ptsWriter: 22.0%Konstadinos Moros: 39.7%39.7%Attempt to Sell a Product -20.2 ptsWriter: 20.2%Konstadinos Moros: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+12.4 ptsWriter: 5.0%Konstadinos Moros: 17.4%17.4%Quote-first Misdirection-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Konstadinos Moros: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.