Topic summary
62%73 analyzed articles/videos57,965 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Rulings results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 45,333 hits. Analysis detected 329,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 264,517 analyzed words across 73 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,321 of 15,399 topics). This Supreme Court Rulings is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score73 analyzed articles264.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Supreme Court says states may protect fair opportunity for women and girls59%
Washington Examiner73%By Connor Bolster57% Tom Jipping0%7/22/2026, 12:45:53 AM
By Firing Election Bureaucrats, Trump Is Just Doing What SCOTUS Ruled He Can Do59%
The Federalist90%By M.D. Kittle73%7/20/2026, 11:14:20 AM
After the Supreme Court killed his first tariffs, Trump turns to a new legal workaround to impose 25% tariffs on Brazil and possibly others53%
Fortune52%By Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez54%7/17/2026, 9:28:52 PM
Illinois Will Finally Stop Stripping People of Their Home Equity—3 Years After the Supreme Court Outlawed It64%
Reason.com38%By Billy Binion39%7/16/2026, 9:05:26 PM
No, Congress can’t just overrule the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship43%
Reason.com38%By Damon Root50%7/16/2026, 11:00:58 AM
Schumer's mentor pushed birthright citizenship crackdown. Now Moreno dares Democrats to reject it.58%
Fox News88%7/15/2026, 12:59:55 PM
The Roberts court is leading America backward on race.87%
Slate68%By David H. Gans0%7/8/2026, 9:40:00 AM
John Roberts has a much more powerful master than Trump: expert88%
Raw Story93%By Alexandria Jacobson0% Investigative Reporter64%7/7/2026, 11:45:13 AM
Here’s The Big Question SCOTUS Left Unanswered In Its Women’s Sports Ruling20%
The Federalist90%By Shawn Fleetwood59%7/7/2026, 11:44:34 AM
Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Neither A Biologist Nor A Qualified Justice93%
The Federalist90%By Glenn T. Stanton0%7/7/2026, 11:31:25 AM