Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David H. Gans results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 2,019 hits . Analysis detected 12,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 92% (568 of 6,382 authors). This David H. Gans is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. David H. Gans
Author details
Total words: 4,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.1% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 41.9% 41.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 42.0% 42.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 36.9% 36.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.1% 23.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 8.1% 8.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.0%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 41.9%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 36.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst