Author summary
39% 6 analyzed articles/videos 456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billy Binion results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,725 hits . Analysis detected 9,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,482 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,377 of 6,628 authors). This Billy Binion is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Billy Binion
Author details
Total words: 13,482
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst