Publication summary
66% 99 analyzed articles/videos 39,727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Daily Caller results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 21,028 hits . Analysis detected 216,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 202,904 analyzed words across 99 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 53% (180 of 379 publications). This The Daily Caller is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 202,904
Article count: 99
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score99 analyzed articles202.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst