Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Wright results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Bandwagon , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,102 of 6,244 authors). This Rachel Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Rachel Wright
Author details
Total words: 2,700
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 11.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst