Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nathan Johnson results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Biased Writer Voice , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 255 hits . Analysis detected 1,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,710 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,258 authors). This Nathan Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nathan Johnson
Author details
Total words: 1,710
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst