Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amber Duke results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 2,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,220 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (629 of 6,318 authors). This Amber Duke is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Amber Duke
Author details
Total words: 1,220
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.1% percentile 7.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.7% 25.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.4% 16.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 9.4% 9.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.2% 8.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 10.4%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 10.0%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst