Megan Rapinoe Pointing Blame At President Trump For US Soccer’s World Cup Exit 73%

By Andrew Powell0%

7/10/2026, 7:06:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 327 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,908 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.

July 10, 2026 3:06 AM ET 
Everybody's got an opinion, and Megan Rapinoe is no different. 
Heading into Monday night's game against Belgium, one of the biggest headlines across the globe was the situation involving President Donald Trump, U.S. soccer forward Folarin Balogun and his red card. 
Anybody who has a brain saw that the call on Balogun was horrible, and after Trump called up FIFA for a review, the organization permitted Balogun to compete implementing the exact rule that gave Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo the ability to play facing circumstances that are similar. 
(RELATED: US Women's Soccer To Get Equal Split Of $16 Million World Cup Winnings After Years Of Crying About Equal Pay) 
But with my Uncle Trump involved, of course, leftists have their panties in a bunch, and former U.S. women's soccer star Megan Rapinoe is no different. 
Recently on her podcast "A Touch More: The Beautiful Game," Rapinoe made the argument that the apparent distraction from Trump brought doom to the men's squad. 
"I think the distraction got to the team for sure in some type of way. 
Whether it was, you know, this red card situation, whether it was being in a public discourse with this president, all of the, you know, shenanigans and chaos that comes with the feelings on both sides of that. 
Whether you agree with it or not it's, it's just like it's a lot to contend with," said Rapinoe . 
BREAKING: President Trump reveals the details of his conversation with FIFA President Gianni Infantino over the controversial red card call on star American player Folarin Balogun. 
"All I did was ask for a review because I didn't think it was a foul. 
And, you know, again, I'm... pic.twitter.com/MD5Q9t44th 
- Fox News (@FoxNews) July 6, 2026 
We like to think that Megan Rapinoe is one of America's biggest idiots ... and well ... nothing has changed. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 6.3%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 2.9%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 29.1%Andrew Powell: 1.4%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic29.1%This article: 3.1%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias10.7%This article: 11.9%Andrew Powell: 11.3%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect11.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.1%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Andrew Powell: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias4.6%This article: 19.6%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias19.6%This article: 37.6%Andrew Powell: 17.6%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias37.6%This article: 4.9%Andrew Powell: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 14.1%Andrew Powell: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error14.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Andrew Powell: 3.3%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias14.4%This article: 8.0%Andrew Powell: 2.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 1.6%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 3.2%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 20.5%Andrew Powell: 7.3%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem20.5%This article: 8.0%Andrew Powell: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man8.0%This article: 8.0%Andrew Powell: 2.2%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority8.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%Andrew Powell: 5.9%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 1.8%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.1%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 20.2%Andrew Powell: 4.9%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion20.2%This article: 10.7%Andrew Powell: 1.6%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question10.7%This article: 33.6%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)33.6%This article: 8.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque8.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.6%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal4.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 25.7%Andrew Powell: 1.3%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)25.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.9%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading4.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.4%Andrew Powell: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote17.4%This article: 8.0%Andrew Powell: 4.3%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection8.0%This article: 43.1%Andrew Powell: 24.0%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice43.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.5%Andrew Powell: 7.0%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias20.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew Powell: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

327 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers31%attributed speech225writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 38 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coveragePresident Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coveragePresident Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Megan Rapinoe

100%flagged-word coverage
73 attributed words72% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice-62.7 ptsWriter: 62.7%Megan Rapinoe: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -29.8 ptsWriter: 29.8%Megan Rapinoe: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+9.0 ptsWriter: 11.6%Megan Rapinoe: 20.5%20.5%Quote-first Misdirection-11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%Megan Rapinoe: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.