Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Rapinoe results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 2,333 hits . Analysis detected 17,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,292 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,812 of 37,533 keywords). This Megan Rapinoe is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Megan Rapinoe
Keyword details
Total words: 9,292
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.1% 25.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst