OutKick97%

Selective Social Justice Warrior Megan Rapinoe Gets Around To Speaking On Iranian Women's Soccer Team 32%

By Mark Harris0%

3/23/2026, 12:00:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Straw Man, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 632 faulty-reasoning hits from 566 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.1% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,921 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the article peer group.

For a so-called feminist who supposedly fights for women's rights at every level  even if the women involved were born male  Megan Rapinoe sure took her time to voice support for the Iranian women's soccer team. 
The Iranian women’s soccer team was in Australia earlier this month, competing in the Women’s Asian Cup as the U.S. and Israel launched a joint military campaign on the Iranian regime. 
The players were dubbed "wartime traitors" by an Iranian broadcaster for their decision not to sing their country's national anthem during the tournament. 
Seven of the Iranian women’s soccer players initially accepted asylum in Australia but turned around and declined the opportunity at the last minute. 
Two Iranian players who stayed in Australia have been seen training with club teams. 
Speaking out against Iran, in a situation that involves the women's national soccer team, should have been a quick, no-brainer decision for Rapinoe. 
Not only is she a former U.S. women's soccer star, but she is also engaged to former WNBA player Sue Bird. 
With same-sex acts being illegal and punishable by death in Iran, the situation hits all the right talking points that Rapinoe would typically pounce on. 
READ: Megyn Kelly Brings Receipts While Ripping 'Rabid, Angry Lesbian' Megan Rapinoe For Attack On USA Hockey 
Video of the Iranian women's soccer team staying silent during the playing of the anthem went viral on March 2, yet Rapinoe didn't mention the situation until her most recent podcast episode, which was published on March 19. 
Rapinoe and Bird uploaded two other episodes of their "A Touch More" podcast between March 2 and March 19, with no mention of what was taking place involving the Iranian women's soccer team. 
"I’m just thinking about this in the context of, like, the immense pressure that these young adults and these young women are under to make a decision like this," Rapinoe explained on the podcast. 
"Like, the incredible courage and bravery it would take knowing what that could potentially mean for their family back home. 
The bravery and courage to protest the national anthem, basically in protest of the Iranian regime and not singing the national anthem during a match. 
The stress and uncertainty they’re facing  their family, their loved ones. 
What does that all mean for back home? 
"I, of course, fully support their decisions to seek asylum and seek a better life and to try to escape an incredibly oppressive regime in that situation. 
I don’t know what’s going on with them and why some of them left and however that is. 
I hope the ones that returned home have done so under their own free will and choice and that their families are safe, that they’re safe, and their friends are safe. 
I hope the ones that have chosen to stay feel a sense of peace and hope about a potential for a new life in Australia or otherwise." 
At the end of the day, anything Rapinoe says about this specific situation has zero impact on what the future holds for Iran or the players on the team. 
But for someone who has built their entire identity around "standing up against the man," she sure took her time to say she supported Iranian women's soccer players and hopes all involved remain safe. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Mark Harris: 7.8%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.3%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 5.2%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 2.8%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.1%Mark Harris: 3.3%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 3.2%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Mark Harris: 8.8%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.5%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.9%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.5%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 4.6%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 3.7%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 14.9%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.7%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Mark Harris: 2.6%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error4.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.5%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.8%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.4%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 4.7%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Mark Harris: 1.6%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.2%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 5.4%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.8%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.3%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Mark Harris: 5.3%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem14.5%This article: 11.8%Mark Harris: 2.1%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man11.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 2.3%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 3.0%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.8%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.6%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 8.4%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 4.8%Mark Harris: 0.7%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring4.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.7%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 5.3%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.7%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 4.0%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.3%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.4%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.2%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.4%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 2.4%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.1%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 2.8%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.0%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.1%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.3%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.1%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 2.1%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 1.1%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 37.5%Mark Harris: 25.2%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice37.5%This article: 4.1%Mark Harris: 3.1%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination4.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Mark Harris: 2.6%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Mark Harris: 0.7%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

566 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker37%attributed speech358writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Rapinoe • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Megan Rapinoe

0%flagged-word coverage
208 attributed words100% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Biased Writer Voice-59.2 ptsWriter: 59.2%Megan Rapinoe: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -14.8 ptsWriter: 14.8%Megan Rapinoe: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%Megan Rapinoe: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.