Topic summary
71% 47 analyzed articles/videos 41,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Justice results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 21,269 hits . Analysis detected 210,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 187,826 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,399 of 15,448 topics). This Social Justice is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Social Justice
Topic details
Total words: 187,826
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score47 analyzed articles187.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst