Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed Ahmad results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,445 hits . Analysis detected 10,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,031 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,200 of 6,192 authors). This Mohammed Ahmad is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Mohammed Ahmad
Author details
Total words: 8,031
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.9% 12.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst