Publication summary
69%7 analyzed articles/videos7,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Knock LA results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 3,570 hits. Analysis detected 28,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,678 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (202 of 379 publications). This Knock LA is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Knock LA
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
47%Knock LA (selected)2%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 30,678
Article count: 7
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles30.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate