Author summary
46% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosalind Jones results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,674 hits . Analysis detected 14,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,973 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,102 of 6,229 authors). This Rosalind Jones is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Rosalind Jones
Author details
Total words: 17,973
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst