Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haniyah P. results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , In-Group Bias , and Bandwagon , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 577 hits . Analysis detected 2,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,072 of 6,628 authors). This Haniyah P. is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Haniyah P.
Author details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 22.7% 22.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 31.2% 31.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 31.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 22.7%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst