Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia S. Beck results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 896 hits . Analysis detected 5,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,414 of 6,263 authors). This Julia S. Beck is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Julia S. Beck
Author details
Total words: 3,969
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.6% 22.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.1% 9.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.1% 8.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst