Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Audrey McGlinchy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 3,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,593 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,171 authors). This Audrey McGlinchy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Audrey McGlinchy
Author details
Total words: 4,593
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.7% 16.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst