Author summary
54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joy Sewing results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 610 hits. Analysis detected 5,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,254 of 6,552 authors). This Joy Sewing is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Joy Sewing
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%Joy Sewing (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,000
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos